Mostplatforms limit you to texts that are only 160 characters long. We give you up to 306 characters so you can send better, more detailed messages. Learn More MMS Marketing. MMS lets you enhance your text message campaigns with coupons, product images, and other rich media. You get up to 1,600 characters of text, too. Learn More Instantaccess to inspirational lesson plans, schemes of work, assessment, interactive activities, resource packs, PowerPoints, teaching ideas at Twinkl! Emotivelanguage is the best form of language to connect with the audiences, be it through written medium or verbal. For Example: Non-Emotive: The government has reduced the gasoline priced. Emotive: The government has slashed the price of gasoline. Explanation: Notice that just by changing the word "reduced" to "slashed", the emotional Tomeet the purpose of the information report, the writer can make certain language choices. These choices can be highlighted and made explicit to the students. See: Example language features (docx - 24.54kb) Note: Not every word or choice needs to be highlighted. For example, in the mentor text, there are many nouns. Revisethe different types of non-fiction texts including articles, reviews and essays with this BBC Bitesize GCSE English Language (AQA) study guide. contoh poster pubertas yang mudah digambar dan menarik. Opinions as half of the old saying goes, everyone’s got em. Whether it’s on Twitter, on Yelp, or in Facebook posts from your great-aunt’s best friend, we’re constantly subjected to other people’s opinions—so if you want to share your take with a wider audience, it’s worthwhile to think about how to make it stand out. And if you zoom in on an opinion, build it out, and give it structure, you’ve got yourself a review. You can review basically anything if you find the right outlet for it, but the best way to present your thoughts depends on what you’re writing about and who your audience is. But with most types of reviews, there’s a simple structure you can stick to in order to help you get started 1 A thesis Before you write, make sure you know the general message you want to convey. A simple thesis will help keep your review from straying off-topic. This could be as straightforward as “I really liked this meal!” or as complex as “These shoes took a while to wear in.” Think to yourself If I were telling a friend about this, what would I want their main takeaway to be? 2 Likes and dislikes In the most glowing review, you may not include any dislikes. If the review is critical, try to find at least one positive to include, just to provide a break in between your incredible zings. 3 Your recommendation A star rating may be the first thing most people see, but when folks skim your review, they’ll probably check the bottom for an idea of whether or not you’d recommend the meal, album, hike, or movie to others. You could also include a short explanation, like “I knocked it down one star because my utensils were dirty,” or “I’d recommend this play, but only if you’re as big of a musical theater buff as I am.” If you need more direction, Grammarly has a few great places to start. Writing a book review? Grammarly has tips and tricks for how to keep your review informative, enlightening, and kind. Remember that you’re reviewing a book that another human poured their heart and soul into to write. Express your honest opinion, but don’t be nasty about it. Imagine if it were your book being reviewed, how would you want a reader to express their critique? If you’re writing a movie review, Grammarly can help keep you from getting too stressed about how to rate the film you just watched Rather than grasp for an arbitrary value, state plainly what a movie called to mind, or how it didn’t quite land with you, and explain why. Writing a review of your new favorite restaurant? You may need to paint a bigger picture of your experience than for the review of the tub of cheese puffs you ordered on Amazon. Avoid vague words and phrases like “The service was bad” or “The pie was great.” Instead, provide specific details like, “The server was friendly but inexperienced and botched our drink order” or “The lemon meringue pie had a wonderfully flaky crust, a tart and tangy filling, and dreamy melt-in-your-mouth meringue.” No matter what kind of review you’re writing, here are a few more quick tips Judge the product, restaurant, escape room, or dog park for what it is. If you’re reviewing a McDonald’s, don’t complain about how you weren’t waited on hand and foot. Write your review based on reasonable expectations. Assume the best. You’re often assessing someone’s execution of their vision or product of their hard work, especially when it comes to art or food. You’re also more than likely writing this review on the internet, where the creator could probably find and see it in just a few clicks. We’re all human—assume the people who made this thing weren’t out to get you. Check your writing. Reviews reflect back on you, and readers might not take your opinion seriously if your spelling is all over the place or you use the word “ambiance” three times in one sentence. Grammarly can help you make sure your review is as effective as possible. More from HowToWrite How To Write a Tweet How To Write a Joke How To Write a Blog How To Write a Book Review How To Write a Complaint How To Write a Bio WHAT IS A BOOK REVIEW? Traditionally, book reviews are written evaluations of a recently published book in any genre. Usually, around the 500 to 700-word mark, they offer a brief description of a text’s main elements while appraising the work’s strengths and weaknesses. Published book reviews can appear in newspapers, magazines, and academic journals. They provide the reader with an overview of the book itself and indicate whether or not the reviewer would recommend the book to the reader. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF A BOOK REVIEW? There was a time when book reviews were a regular appearance in every quality newspaper and many periodicals. They were essential elements in whether or not a book would sell well. A review from a heavyweight critic could often be the deciding factor in whether a book became a bestseller or a damp squib. In the last few decades, however, the book review’s influence has waned considerably, with many potential book buyers preferring to consult customer reviews on Amazon, or sites like Goodreads, before buying. As a result, book review’s appearance in newspapers, journals, and digital media has become less frequent. WHY BOTHER TEACHING STUDENTS TO WRITE BOOK REVIEWS AT ALL? Even in the heyday of the book review’s influence, few students who learned the craft of writing a book review became literary critics! The real value of crafting a well-written book review for a student does not lie in their ability to impact book sales. Understanding how to produce a well-written book review helps students to ● Engage critically with a text ● Critically evaluate a text ● Respond personally to a range of different writing genres ● Improve their own reading, writing, and thinking skills. Not to Be Confused with a Book Report! WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A BOOK REVIEW AND A BOOK REPORT? While the terms are often used interchangeably, there are clear differences in both the purpose and the format of the two genres. Generally speaking, book reports aim to give a more detailed outline of what occurs in a book. A book report on a work of fiction will tend to give a comprehensive account of the characters, major plot lines, and themes in the book. Book reports are usually written around the K-12 age range, while book reviews tend not to be undertaken by those at the younger end of this age range due to the need for the higher-level critical skills required in writing them. At their highest expression, book reviews are written at the college level and by professional critics. Learn how to write a book review step by step with our complete guide for students and teachers by familiarizing yourself with the structure and features. BOOK REVIEW STRUCTURE ANALYZE Evaluate the book with a critical mind. THOROUGHNESS The whole is greater than the sum of all its parts. Review the book as a WHOLE. COMPARE Where appropriate compare to similar texts and genres. THUMBS UP OR DOWN? You are going to have to inevitably recommend or reject this book to potential readers. BE CONSISTENT Take a stance and stick with it throughout your review. FEATURES OF A BOOK REVIEW PAST TENSE You are writing about a book you have already read. EMOTIVE LANGUAGE Whatever your stance or opinion be passionate about it. Your audience will thank you for it. VOICE Both active and passive voice are used in recounts. A COMPLETE UNIT ON REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF TEXTS ⭐ Make MOVIES A MEANINGFUL PART OF YOUR CURRICULUM with this engaging collection of tasks and tools your students will love. ⭐ All the hard work is done for you with NO PREPARATION REQUIRED. This collection of 21 INDEPENDENT TASKS and GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS takes students beyond the hype, special effects and trailers to look at visual literacy from several perspectives offering DEEP LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES by watching a SERIES, DOCUMENTARY, FILM, and even VIDEO GAMES. ELEMENTS OF A BOOK REVIEW As with any of the writing genres we teach our students, a book review can be helpfully explained in terms of criteria. While there is much to the art’ of writing, there is also, thankfully, a lot of the nuts and bolts that can be listed too. Have students consider the following elements before writing ● Title Often, the title of the book review will correspond to the title of the text itself, but there may also be some examination of the title’s relevance. How does it fit into the purpose of the work as a whole? Does it convey a message or reveal larger themes explored within the work? ● Author Within the book review, there may be some discussion of who the author is and what they have written before, especially if it relates to the current work being reviewed. There may be some mention of the author’s style and what they are best known for. If the author has received any awards or prizes, this may also be mentioned within the body of the review. ● Genre A book review will identify the genre that the book belongs to, whether fiction or nonfiction, poetry, romance, science-fiction, history etc. The genre will likely tie in, too with who the intended audience for the book is and what the overall purpose of the work is. ● Book Jacket / Cover Often, a book’s cover will contain artwork that is worthy of comment. It may contain interesting details related to the text that contribute to, or detract from, the work as a whole. ● Structure The book’s structure will often be heavily informed by its genre. Have students examine how the book is organized before writing their review. Does it contain a preface from a guest editor, for example? Is it written in sections or chapters? Does it have a table of contents, index, glossary etc.? While all these details may not make it into the review itself, looking at how the book is structured may reveal some interesting aspects. ● Publisher and Price A book review will usually contain details of who publishes the book and its cost. A review will often provide details of where the book is available too. WHEN WRITING A BOOK REVIEW YOUR GOAL IS TO GO BEYOND SIMPLY SCRATCHING THE SURFACE AND MAKE A DEEP ANALYSIS OF A TEXT. BOOK REVIEW KEY ELEMENTS As students read and engage with the work they will review, they will develop a sense of the shape their review will take. This will begin with the summary. Encourage students to take notes during the reading of the work that will help them in writing the summary that will form an essential part of their review. Aspects of the book they may wish to take notes on in a work of fiction may include ● Characters Who are the main characters? What are their motivations? Are they convincingly drawn? Or are they empathetic characters? ● Themes What are the main themes of the work? Are there recurring motifs in the work? Is the exploration of the themes deep or surface only? ● Style What are the key aspects of the writer’s style? How does it fit into the wider literary world? ● Plot What is the story’s main catalyst? What happens in the rising action? What are the story’s subplots? A book review will generally begin with a short summary of the work itself. However, it is important not to give too much away, remind students – no spoilers, please! For nonfiction works, this may be a summary of the main arguments of the work, again, without giving too much detail away. In a work of fiction, a book review will often summarise up to the rising action of the piece without going beyond to reveal too much! The summary should also provide some orientation for the reader. Given the nature of the purpose of a review, it is important that students’ consider their intended audience in the writing of their review. Readers will most likely not have read the book in question and will require some orientation. This is often achieved through introductions to the main characters, themes, primary arguments etc. This will help the reader to gauge whether or not the book is of interest to them. Once your student has summarized the work, it is time to review’ in earnest. At this point, the student should begin to detail their own opinion of the book. To do this well they should i. Make It Personal Often when teaching essay writing we will talk to our students about the importance of climbing up and down the ladder of abstraction. Just as it is helpful to explore large, more abstract concepts in an essay by bringing it down to Earth, in a book review, it is important that students can relate the characters, themes, ideas etc to their own lives. Book reviews are meant to be subjective. They are opinion pieces, and opinions grow out of our experiences of life. Encourage students to link the work they are writing about to their own personal life within the body of the review. By making this personal connection to the work, students contextualize their opinions for the readers and help them to understand whether the book will be of interest to them or not in the process. ii. Make It Universal Just as it is important to climb down the ladder of abstraction to show how the work relates to individual life, it is important to climb upwards on the ladder too. Students should endeavor to show how the ideas explored in the book relate to the wider world. The may be in the form of the universality of the underlying themes in a work of fiction or, for example, the international implications for arguments expressed in a work of nonfiction. iii. Support Opinions with Evidence A book review is a subjective piece of writing by its very nature. However, just because it is subjective does not mean that opinions do not need to be justified. Make sure students understand how to back up their opinions with various forms of evidence, for example, quotations, statistics, and the use of primary and secondary sources. EDIT AND REVISE YOUR BOOK REVIEW As with any writing genre, encourage students to polish things up with review and revision at the end. Encourage them to proofread and check for accurate spelling throughout, with particular attention to the author’s name, character names, publisher etc. It is good practice too for students to double-check their use of evidence. Are statements supported? Are the statistics used correctly? Are the quotations from the text accurate? Mistakes such as these uncorrected can do great damage to the value of a book review as they can undermine the reader’s confidence in the writer’s judgement. The discipline of writing book reviews offers students opportunities to develop their writing skills and exercise their critical faculties. Book reviews can be valuable standalone activities or serve as a part of a series of activities engaging with a central text. They can also serve as an effective springboard into later discussion work based on the ideas and issues explored in a particular book. Though the book review does not hold the sway it once did in the mind’s of the reading public, it still serves as an effective teaching tool in our classrooms today. Teaching Resources Use our resources and tools to improve your student’s writing skills through proven teaching strategies. BOOK REVIEW GRAPHIC ORGANIZER TEMPLATE 101 DIGITAL & PRINT GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS FOR ALL CURRICULUM AREAS Introduce your students to 21st-century learning with this GROWING BUNDLE OF 101 EDITABLE & PRINTABLE GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS. ✌NO PREP REQUIRED!!!✌ Go paperless, and let your students express their knowledge and creativity through the power of technology and collaboration inside and outside the classroom with ease. Whilst you don’t have to have a 11 or BYOD classroom to benefit from this bundle, it has been purpose-built to deliver through platforms such as ✔ GOOGLE CLASSROOM, ✔ OFFICE 365, ✔ or any CLOUD-BASED LEARNING PLATFORM. Book and Movie review writing examples Student Writing Samples Below are a collection of student writing samples of book reviews. Click on the image to enlarge and explore them in greater detail. Please take a moment to both read the movie or book review in detail but also the teacher and student guides which highlight some of the key elements of writing a text review Please understand these student writing samples are not intended to be perfect examples for each age or grade level but a piece of writing for students and teachers to explore together to critically analyze to improve student writing skills and deepen their understanding of book review writing. We would recommend reading the example either a year above and below, as well as the grade you are currently working with to gain a broader appreciation of this text type. Year 3Year 4Year 5Year 6Year 7Year 8 OTHER GREAT ARTICLES RELATED TO BOOK REVIEWS The content for this page has been written by Shane Mac Donnchaidh. A former principal of an international school and English university lecturer with 15 years of teaching and administration experience. Shane’s latest Book, The Complete Guide to Nonfiction Writing, can be found here. Editing and support for this article have been provided by the literacyideas team. AbstractOnline reviews play a critical role in customer’s purchase decision making process on the web. The reviews are often ranked based on user helpfulness votes to minimize the review information overload problem. This paper examines the factors that contribute towards helpfulness of online reviews and builds a predictive model. The proposed predictive model extracts novel linguistic category features by analysing the textual content of reviews. In addition, the model makes use of review metadata, subjectivity and readability related features for helpfulness prediction. Our experimental analysis on two real-life review datasets reveals that a hybrid set of features deliver the best predictive accuracy. We also show that the proposed linguistic category features are better predictors of review helpfulness for experience goods such as books, music, and video games. The findings of this study can provide new insights to e-commerce retailers for better organization and ranking of online reviews and help customers in making better product advent of Web has enabled users to share their opinions, experiences and knowledge via blogs, forums, and other social media websites. In the e-commerce context, Web allows consumers to share their purchase and usage experiences in the form of product reviews Amazon product reviews, CNET reviews. Such reviews contain valuable information and are often used by potential customers for making purchase decisions. However, some of the most popular products receive several hundreds or thousands of reviews resulting in a review information overload problem. Besides, the review quality across large volume of reviews exhibits wide variations Liu et al., 2008, Tsur and Rappoport, 2009.In order to help potential customers in navigating through large volume of reviews, e-commerce websites provide an interactive voting feature. For example, Amazon asks its review viewers “Was this review helpful? Yes/No” to get user votes on reviews. The votes thus gathered from multiple users are then aggregated, ranked and presented, “24 of 36 people found the following review helpful”. Reviews with higher share of helpful votes are ranked higher than the ones with lower helpful votes. This paper aims to study the factors that play an important role for a review to get higher helpful votes. Such an analysis is important for the following reasons First, reviews can be effectively summarized by filtering low quality reviews. Second, websites that do not use voting feature could benefit from an automated helpfulness prediction system. Third, review ranking system could be improved with a better understanding of the underlying review helpfulness factors, avoiding early bird bias problem Liu, Cao, Lin, Huang, & Zhou, 2007.The review voting behaviour which influences review helpfulness can be visualized as a socio-psychological process between the reviewer and the reviewee. This process is facilitated by Web as a communication medium. Language plays a very important role in this process between the reviewer and reviewee. In an offline world, communication between a sender and receiver is often influenced by non-verbal cues, communication contexts and past interactions between the sender and receiver. In the absence of such external factors in the online world, language plays a crucial role. The sender’s message composed using a language impacts the receivers cognition and influences their behaviour. As the sender’s message can be composed in numerous ways, its impact on the receivers cognition and behaviour varies. Our basic intuition is that the review voting behaviour can be better understood by studying the psychological properties and propensities of the language. The Linguistic Category Model LCM proposed by Semin and Fiedler 1991 is a conceptual framework that models psychological properties of the language. The linguistic categories used in the LCM model and their descriptions are presented in Table LCM model Coenen et al., 2006, Semin and Fiedler, 1991 uses three broad linguistic categories, namely Adjectives fantastic, excellent, beautiful, State verbs love, hate, envy and Action verbs. The action verbs are further sub-divided into State Action Verbs amaze, anger, shock, Interpretive Action Verbs help, avoid, recommend, and Descriptive Action Verbs call, talk, run. All of these linguistic categories are organized on a abstract-to-concrete dimension. At one extreme ADJ the terms are abstract, less verifiable, more disputable and least informative. While at the other extreme DAVs, the terms are concrete, verifiable, less disputable and most the following three review examples tagged with key linguistic categories fantastic ADJ camera. The picture quality of this camera is wonderful ADJ. is my first camera and I love SV it. The camera is excellent ADJ. regularly takeDAV pics with this camera. The quality of the pics has really amazed SAV me. Battery life is fabulous ADJ. My only issue is that it makes DAV a lot of noise in autofocus mode. I strongly recommend IAV this 1 is highly abstract and subjective as it primarily uses adjectives. Review 2 uses a subjective verb love’ indicating the emotional state of the reviewer. The last review provides a more concrete and objective description of the camera using DAVs. Besides, it also contains subjective ADJ opinion of the reviewer. It is evident that the review 3 with far more concrete and descriptive information is likely to be more helpful than other two reviews for purchase decision making. Therefore, our basic intuition is that the linguistic categories impact the receivers or consumers cognitive process, influence their voting behaviour and affect review this paper, our objective is to examine the use of such linguistic category features for predicting review helpfulness. We make a first attempt at devising a new method for extracting linguistic category features from review text and build a binary classification model. We conduct a detailed experimental analysis on two real-life review datasets to demonstrate the utility of the proposed linguistic features. Furthermore, we study the effect of product type on review helpfulness and show that the proposed linguistic features are better predictors of review helpfulness for experience rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the related work on review helpfulness. Section 3 elucidates the proposed novel features used in the model. Subsequently, Section 4 presents detailed experimental analysis, results and discussions. Section 5 highlights the implications of this research to theory and practice. Finally, Section 6 provides concluding remarks and outlines directions for future research snippetsRelated literatureZhang and Varadarajan 2006 build a regression model for predicting the utility of product reviews. They use lexical similarity, syntactic terms based on Part-Of-Speech POS, and lexical subjectivity as features. Mudambi and Schuff 2010 formulated a linear regression model for determining factors that contribute towards review helpfulness. Their work was replicated by Huang and Yen 2013 and achieved just 15% explanatory power. The authors conclude that the review helpfulness predictionReview helpfulness modelWe first describe the terminology used in this paper and formally define the problem. Then, we explain the features used in our prediction review datasetsWe used two real-life datasets for the experimentation. First dataset is a publicly available multi-domain sentiment analysis dataset Blitzer, Dredze, & Pereira, 2007. This dataset has 13120 customer reviews across four different product categories. The second dataset, a more recent review dataset, is obtained by crawling website. The details of both the datasets are summarized in Table datasets are cleaned and prepared for analysis by applying the following threeImplicationsThe findings of this paper has implications for both theory and practice. From a theoretical perspective, the paper brings fresh ideas into the expert and intelligent systems research community from social psychology literature. The basic ideas for the linguistic category features introduced in this paper are borrowed from the LCM model Semin & Fiedler, 1991 used in psychology literature. Another important contribution of this paper is the design of automatic linguistic category featureConclusionsThis paper examined the online review helpfulness problem and built a new prediction model. The proposed model used hybrid set of features review metadata, subjectivity, readability, and linguistic category to predict review helpfulness. The effectiveness of the proposed model was empirically evaluated on two real-life review datasets. The linguistic category features was found to be effective in predicting helpfulness of experience paper described an automatic linguistic categoryReferences 30 et determinants of voting for the helpfulness of online user reviews A text mining approachDecision Support Systems2011N. Korfiatis et content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review contentElectronic Commerce Research and Applications2012S. Lee et the helpfulness of online reviews using multilayer perceptron neural networksExpert Systems with Applications2014Z. Liu et makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websitesTourism Management2015 Ngo-Ye et influence of reviewer engagement characteristics on online review helpfulness A text regression modelDecision Support Systems2014Y. Pan et unequal A study of the helpfulness of user-generated product reviewsJournal of Retailing2011S. Baccianella et An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion miningBird, S. 2006. Nltk The natural language toolkit. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on interactive presentation...Blitzer, J., Dredze, M., & Pereira, F. 2007. Biographies, bollywood, boomboxes and blenders Domain adaptation for...L. BreimanRandom forestsMachine Learning2001 Chang et A library for support vector machinesThe ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems2011 Chua et review helpfulness as a function of reviewer reputation, review rating, and review depthJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology2014Coenen, L. H. M., Hedebouw, L., & Semin, G. R. 2006. The Linguistic Category Model LCM. Retrieved from...DuBay, W. H. 2004. The principles of readability. Impact Information....A. Ghose et the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews Mining text and reviewer characteristicsIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering2011Cited by 151Complementary or Substitutive? A Novel Deep Learning Method to Leverage Text-image Interactions for Multimodal Review Helpfulness Prediction2022, Expert Systems with ApplicationsSpecifically, the review-related features are exemplified by review sentiment extremity Li, Wu, & Mai, 2019, review timeliness Liu et al., 2008, review length Hong et al., 2017, writing style Siering, Muntermann, & Rajagopalan, 2018, etc. The textual semantic features of reviews such as multilingual characteristics Zhang & Lin, 2018, linguistic features Krishnamoorthy, 2015 were also verified as being of great importance to the RHP. To better leverage textual review information, researchers also adopted deep learning models to obtain powerful hidden representation features of the review texts Kong et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2018.View all citing articles on ScopusRecommended articles 6View full textCopyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

language features of review text